Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test data. Test script (Downloads enum) #168

Open
joncison opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Test data. Test script (Downloads enum) #168

joncison opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@joncison
Copy link
Member

Not sure it makes sense to have separate terms for these. I'd expect almost invariably, test data and scripts, where supplied (almost never, but systematically for evertything in EMBOSS back in the day :) ) would actually be multiple files, so separating out doesn't make sense anyway.

Propose to consolidate into Test data and scripts

Objections @hansioan @matuskalas @hmenager ?

@joncison joncison added this to the 3.2.0 milestone Nov 20, 2019
@joncison joncison changed the title Test data. Test script Test data. Test script (Downloads enum) Nov 20, 2019
@joncison
Copy link
Member Author

This usually combined in common folder e.g. in GitHub or wherever.

Could rename to "Example data" and drop "Test scripts" (no data for it)

Only 4 items for Test data currently.

For now ... take no action

@joncison
Copy link
Member Author

Leaving this for now

@joncison joncison self-assigned this Nov 25, 2019
@joncison joncison removed this from the 3.2.0 milestone Nov 25, 2019
@joncison joncison removed the wontfix label Mar 20, 2020
@joncison joncison added this to the 3.3.0 milestone Mar 20, 2020
@joncison
Copy link
Member Author

@hansioan I'm proposing we act on this one and do the merge for reasons given above.. If bio.tools took off for supporting some imagined auto-benchmarking efforts we'd need to revisit probably with some dedicated metadata / structure. cc @veitveit what do you think?

@joncison
Copy link
Member Author

joncison commented Apr 1, 2020

nudge-nudge @veitveit - do you have an opinion on this ?

@veitveit
Copy link
Member

veitveit commented Apr 1, 2020

I would keep this rather open for now. In most cases, test data should be available via a link.

@joncison joncison removed this from the 3.3.0 milestone May 13, 2020
@joncison
Copy link
Member Author

@hansioan - we leave this as-is for now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants