Skip to content

Issues: bitcoin-cap/bcap

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

39 Open 4 Closed
39 Open 4 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Activate free github.io website to more easily view document online
#57 opened Nov 26, 2024 by 5atoshiNakamoto
Re: TOC – Discrepancy between content hierarchy in PDF and markdown versions
#51 opened Nov 19, 2024 by yashrajd
Misleading / incomplete definition of a soft fork
#48 opened Nov 17, 2024 by NORICVM
Add Developer Time Incentive for most groups
#47 opened Nov 14, 2024 by jimmysong
add presentation doc, links to where we have given presentation, podcast links to the project
#46 opened Nov 14, 2024 by moneyball
add BCAP non-goals to introduction
#45 opened Nov 14, 2024 by moneyball
Further considerations from crypto trading platforms with leverage
#44 opened Nov 11, 2024 by jonathanbier
3
miscategorization for protocol devs to adopt an alternative client
#42 opened Nov 8, 2024 by adamjonas
1
2
misaligned footnotes
#41 opened Nov 8, 2024 by adamjonas
1
2
missing speedy trial description in how changes are activated section
#40 opened Nov 8, 2024 by adamjonas
1
Risk of Developer Capture
#39 opened Nov 8, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
3
Add table of contents for markdown version
#38 opened Nov 8, 2024 by moneyball
Chip manufacturers as separate stakeholder
#34 opened Nov 8, 2024 by Giszmo
3
Custodians as stakeholders
#32 opened Nov 8, 2024 by Giszmo
1
Confusing fork with activation date example
#31 opened Nov 7, 2024 by Giszmo
Soft Fork Risks underrepresented
#29 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
5
State of Mind vs Incentive-Driven Behavior
#28 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
Alternative Clients Portrayed too negatively
#27 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
4
Symptomatic, Market-Driven Approach not specified
#24 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
1
Misusing "Game Theory"
#23 opened Nov 7, 2024 by BitcoinErrorLog
Add hyperlinks to section 4.3 Determining Consensus
#21 opened Nov 7, 2024 by moneyball
Add Miners stakeholder sub-category table similar to Investors
#19 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
1
1
Consider new framing for chain splits
#17 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Add disincentives for each stakeholder group
#16 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
Estimate how many people are in each stakeholder group
#15 opened Nov 5, 2024 by moneyball
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.