You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The only client compatible with the IFP rule you have introduced into the specification of your site (which, if I may say, is quite misleading now to Bitcoin Cash users), is Bitcoin ABC.
ABC has now put out a confused announcement but it seems their client will continue to support the existing BCH chain (without IFP) in future:
Accordingly, I suggest you remove the IFP from your November "Bitcoin Cash" specifications on here, to restore some confidence of people that the Bitcoin Cash protocol remains unified against this "new coinbase rule" that diverts 8%+ of coinbase rewards to ABC.
I also suggest taking the IFP-encumbered specification and moving it to some other specification repository for that new chain. Don't know if you're in charge of that, but it seems you are, as you introduced the IFP on here despite people asking you not to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The only client compatible with the IFP rule you have introduced into the specification of your site (which, if I may say, is quite misleading now to Bitcoin Cash users), is Bitcoin ABC.
ABC has now put out a confused announcement but it seems their client will continue to support the existing BCH chain (without IFP) in future:
Accordingly, I suggest you remove the IFP from your November "Bitcoin Cash" specifications on here, to restore some confidence of people that the Bitcoin Cash protocol remains unified against this "new coinbase rule" that diverts 8%+ of coinbase rewards to ABC.
I also suggest taking the IFP-encumbered specification and moving it to some other specification repository for that new chain. Don't know if you're in charge of that, but it seems you are, as you introduced the IFP on here despite people asking you not to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: