Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bridge/Gateway A/B test #313

Open
tomjeatt opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Bridge/Gateway A/B test #313

tomjeatt opened this issue Nov 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
prio:high Important due to deadlines and/or clear needs/benefits.

Comments

@tomjeatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Initial test (using Posthog) to do the following:

Review after two weeks. We would be looking for:

  • Conversions (i.e. do more Gateway visitors convert, do we see more drop offs)
  • Any increase in Gateway usage
  • Relative usage
  • Analysis—what behaviour do we see from users directed to Gateway vs. Ethereum bridge.

This is an opportunity to try out Posthog, and see what kind of data we get. Future experiments will have a better formed hypothesis. But this is a good place to start because it doesn't require any code changes, since the A/B test only requires specifying query parameters.

@tomjeatt tomjeatt added the prio:high Important due to deadlines and/or clear needs/benefits. label Nov 15, 2024
@tomjeatt tomjeatt moved this to Todo ⏳ in Backlog Nov 15, 2024
@tomjeatt tomjeatt added this to Backlog Nov 15, 2024
@tomjeatt tomjeatt changed the title Bridge A/B test Bridge/Gateway A/B test Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
prio:high Important due to deadlines and/or clear needs/benefits.
Projects
Status: Todo ⏳
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant