Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
AlternativeAs an alternative to having
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
If I recall correctly, when RFC#13 (app source metadata) was introduced, the concrete specification for how different type of sources would be represented was left out of the specification. I believe this was in order to allow for conventions to fill the need of countless possible types.
I'd like to propose the following conventions to be used on pack and for them to be codified as "conventions" in https://buildpacks.io/docs/.
App Source Conventions
Type
git
Based on already completed work on kpack:
Type
image
When source is an image (kpack feature):
Type
project
When declared in
project.toml
as:The generated metadata would be:
Open Questions
.git
information as well asproject.toml
?In the short term,.git
takes precedence overproject.toml
due to its more precise nature.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions