You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your work on this optimized version of minimap2, I think it is quite useful. I was recently building out a pipeline involving the pairwise alignment of possibly divergent (~75% ANI) assemblies and noticed that minimap2 and mm2-fast do not give the same result. The underlying command was:
minimap2 -x asm20 assembly_a assembly_b
I know this is not really the intended purpose of minimap2, but I thought it strange that the results were not consistent between your fork and the main branch. I can find example NCBI assemblies to give different results if you want to look into it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi jdwinkler, we're working on accelerating pairwise alignment on GPU and I'm also running into inconsistent results between minimap2 2.24, the algorithm described in the Minimap2 paper, and this mm2-fast kernel. I'm digging into these divergent results. Could you share some example NCBI assemblies with me?
Hi,
Thanks for your work on this optimized version of minimap2, I think it is quite useful. I was recently building out a pipeline involving the pairwise alignment of possibly divergent (~75% ANI) assemblies and noticed that minimap2 and mm2-fast do not give the same result. The underlying command was:
minimap2 -x asm20 assembly_a assembly_b
I know this is not really the intended purpose of minimap2, but I thought it strange that the results were not consistent between your fork and the main branch. I can find example NCBI assemblies to give different results if you want to look into it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: