Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

default charmcraft_channel, TEST_VIP0X #226

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xtrusia
Copy link
Contributor

@xtrusia xtrusia commented Sep 6, 2024

charm func test runner: default charmcraft_channel

The charmcraft channel defaults to 1.5/stable [1], some charms omit
it from osci.yaml [2] so we need to implement a default.

[1] https://github.com/openstack-charmers/zosci-config/blob/master/roles/charm-build/defaults/main.yaml
[2] https://github.com/openstack/charm-glance-simplestreams-sync/blob/stable/yoga/osci.yaml

Adding TEST_VIP0x for some charms ( e.g charm-mysql-router )

[1] https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aopenstack-charmers%2Fzaza-openstack-tests+TEST_VIP00&type=code

Copy link
Member

@pponnuvel pponnuvel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@xtrusia xtrusia force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from db1bb2d to 6e3bf89 Compare September 11, 2024 09:00
@xtrusia xtrusia changed the title Some fix for older charm charm func test runner: default charmcraft_channel Sep 11, 2024
@xtrusia xtrusia changed the title charm func test runner: default charmcraft_channel default charmcraft_channel, TEST_VIP0X Sep 11, 2024
Copy link
Member

@dosaboy dosaboy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm thanks seyeong!

@dosaboy dosaboy merged commit ac246a1 into canonical:main Sep 11, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants