Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution for Exercise 05 from Chapter 01 in Baby Rudin #19

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

gapry
Copy link
Contributor

@gapry gapry commented Jan 14, 2024

This pull request provides the solution for Exercise 05, Chapter 01, from the third edition of Principles of Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin.

Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex05.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex05.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex05.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Books/BabyRudin/Chapter01/ex05.tex Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ceciliachan1979
Copy link
Owner

Old PR note, rebased to main, this solution still have a major flaw.

@gapry
Copy link
Contributor Author

gapry commented Feb 21, 2024

Old PR note, rebased to main, this solution still have a major flaw.

Got it, I will fix it in 12 hrs.

@ceciliachan1979
Copy link
Owner

@E7-87-83, logic 上我搵唔到問題了,但硬係覺得 presentation 好怪,你可唔可以指點一下?

@E7-87-83
Copy link
Collaborator

".... we know that for all y ∈ −A, y ≤ sup(−A) is true."
呢句需要證明。

@gapry
Copy link
Contributor Author

gapry commented Feb 24, 2024

".... we know that for all y ∈ −A, y ≤ sup(−A) is true." 呢句需要證明。

係咪要證明 sup(-A) 係 exist ? ? ?

@E7-87-83
Copy link
Collaborator

哦……

不如咁改寫 "Let’s claim y = −x. By definition of sup, for all y ∈ −A, y ≤ sup(−A) is true."

@ceciliachan1979 ceciliachan1979 merged commit 076c509 into ceciliachan1979:main Mar 5, 2024
1 check passed
@gapry gapry deleted the rudin-1-5 branch March 13, 2024 04:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants