You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have experimental data showing contacts between residues <35 angstroms and we wanted to evaluate chai fold's ability to improve on previously predicted structures using the constraints feature.
After running our inferences with and without the constraint files, I find almost no difference in the distance between our residues of interest (each group of dots is a residue pair we hoped to see 'constrained', I calculated distance for all 5 ranked inferences):
Any idea why the non-constrained and constrained results would be close to each other? I would expect to see at least some bias toward closer contact. Here is an example line from our constraints file:
Thanks for trying the restraints! The restraints in Chai-1 are trained as inter-chain contacts; based on the line you've provided, it looks like you're trying to specify an intra-chain contact. Intra-chain contacts are more akin to structure templates, which you may be able to hack into the TemplateContext.
We have experimental data showing contacts between residues <35 angstroms and we wanted to evaluate chai fold's ability to improve on previously predicted structures using the constraints feature.
After running our inferences with and without the constraint files, I find almost no difference in the distance between our residues of interest (each group of dots is a residue pair we hoped to see 'constrained', I calculated distance for all 5 ranked inferences):
Any idea why the non-constrained and constrained results would be close to each other? I would expect to see at least some bias toward closer contact. Here is an example line from our constraints file:
K70,K490,A,A,contact,1.0,0.0,35.0,xlink,restraint_3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: