Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFM - hte #1179

Closed
3 tasks done
NomsterDude opened this issue Jan 6, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

RFM - hte #1179

NomsterDude opened this issue Jan 6, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@NomsterDude
Copy link

NomsterDude commented Jan 6, 2022

I DON'T Want To Become The Maintainer

  • I have followed the Package Triage Process and I do NOT want to become maintainer of the package;
  • There is no existing open maintainer request for this package;

Checklist

  • Issue title starts with 'RFM - '

Existing Package Details

Package URL: https://chocolatey.org/packages/hte
Package source URL:

Date the maintainer was contacted (in YYYY-MM-DD): 2021-12-13
How the maintainer was contacted: Contacted via Email

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2022

Package Request Validation

We have finished some basic validation of this request. The result of this validation can be found below:

Request Notices

We found some issues we could not fully validate without user input, or by human review. Please make any necessary changes when appropriate.

  • We could not detect that you have specified the url to the source of the package. If there is no package source available, then you can safely ignore this message. If there is a package source available, then please add this url to the 'Package source URL:' part of the issue.

Please note that this check is currently in alpha, and may not be able to detect everything correctly.
Humans may also be able to detect other issues with this request.

@tunisiano187
Copy link
Contributor

Hello,
This software isn't updated since the last package 2015.
The package updating isn't required.

as this is a dtgm package, should we remove it from it's git ? is that an official way about it ?
Thank you.

@pauby
Copy link
Member

pauby commented Apr 13, 2024

That is a good question.

@gep13 what are your thoughts?

@gep13
Copy link
Member

gep13 commented Apr 16, 2024

Hmm, that is an interesting point...

Since the package version is still the current version, I would be inclined to leave it in the dtgm repository, until someone takes over maintenance of it, if/when there is a new version available.

@pauby
Copy link
Member

pauby commented Apr 16, 2024

I'll go ahead and close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants