RFP - friction

[luzpaz]

Checklist

• The package I am requesting does not already exist on https://community.chocolatey.org/packages;
• There is no open issue for this package;
• The issue title starts with 'RFP - ';
• The download URL is public and not locked behind a paywall / login;

Package Details

Software project URL : https://friction.graphics
Direct download URL for the software / installer : https://github.com/friction2d/friction/releases/download/v0.9.4/friction-0.9.4-setup-win64.exe
Software summary / short description: an open-source, vector-based application designed for creating web animations and videos.

[github-actions]

Package Request Validation

We have finished some basic validation of this request. The result of this validation can be found below:

Request Issues to fix

We have found the following issues with this request. Please update the issue to reflect any necessary changes mentioned.

• We could not detect that you have provided a URL to the software project site, please add this to the 'Software project URL:' part of the template.

New Maintainer Notices

This section details some parts of the request that any upcoming maintainer may need to take into consideration.

File Validation Output

TrID/32 - File Identifier v2.24 - (C) 2003-16 By M.Pontello
Definitions found:  16497
Analyzing...

Collecting data from file: C:\Users\RUNNER~1\AppData\Local\Temp/software.tmp
 62.9% (.EXE) Inno Setup installer (109740/4/30)
 23.8% (.EXE) Win32 EXE PECompact compressed (generic) (41569/9/9)
  6.0% (.EXE) Win64 Executable (generic) (10523/12/4)
  2.5% (.EXE) Win32 Executable (generic) (4505/5/1)
  1.1% (.EXE) Win16/32 Executable Delphi generic (2072/23)

Please note that this check is currently in alpha, and may not be able to detect everything correctly.
Humans may also be able to detect other issues with this request.

[luzpaz]

• We could not detect that you have provided a URL to the software project site, please add this to the 'Software project URL:' part of the template.

https://friction.graphics/ is a valid URL

[pauby]

Is it on the same line?

[luzpaz]

Is it on the same line?

Indeed

[pauby]

I've had a look at the code, and unfortunately, I can't see where the issues lies. I'll leave that to @AdmiringWorm. In the meantime I'll change the labels.

[AdmiringWorm]

The bot currently only thinks any URL that has the top-level domain of a maximum of 6 characters is valid. As the specified URL has an 8-character top-level domain, it isn't considered a valid one by the bot.

[pauby]

I thought the same and I amended this line to {1,10}. It may have been the wrong line, or I was holding it wrong, but it didn't make any difference.

[AdmiringWorm]

I thought the same and I amended this line to {1,10}. It may have been the wrong line, or I was holding it wrong, but it didn't make any difference.

That is the line that needs to be updated, as well as line 59 as well.
I do not believe there is anywhere else, I'll look into it when I have time.

[AdmiringWorm]

@pauby the top domain validation is now fixed and should allow top domains of up to 10 characters now.