-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Spatial-> Vertical extent wording (again..) #180
Comments
#190 is related to that issue.
From ACDD https://wiki.esipfed.org/Attribute_Convention_for_Data_Discovery_1-3
|
Ideally the following fields should be available:
|
We will have vertical up/down relative to ocean surface (EPSG 5829/5831), we can add a third option to manually enter an EPSG for those who need that. |
Sadly I think the text for vertical direction in the metadata form is still a bit wrong, since it mentions sea level 😿
and EPSG doesnt mention sea level, probably because it can be used for depths in lakes as well, and we do have some lake data
We could change the example given: (i.e. a maximum value of 150m implies 150m below
sea levelthe surface).Definitions: https://epsg.io/5831 , https://epsg.io/5829
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: