You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In commit postgres/postgres@b39c5272 021_twophase test was changed, and it doesn't pass with loaded Citus library any more. Apparently, when max_prepared_transactions is set to zero, Citus overrides it, while the test sets this GUC to zero and relies on this.
Here is how I run this test. In postgres build directory:
Citus overrides max_prepared_transactions in function AdjustMaxPreparedTransactions:
/*
* As Citus uses 2PC internally, there always should be some available. As
* the default is 0, we increase it to something appropriate
* (connections * 2 currently). If the user explicitly configured 2PC, we
* leave the configuration alone - there might have been intent behind the
* decision.
*/
if (max_prepared_xacts == 0)
{
...
}
The comment is slightly inconsistent with the code here. If max_prepared_transactions is set to zero explicitly (as it is in 021_twophase test), Citus overrides it anyway.
Do you think fixing Citus to pass this test worth it? I'm going to create a pull request soon, where I change AdjustMaxPreparedTransactions to really check if max_prepared_transactions is explicitly set by user. Please take a look.
I also believe that it should be mentioned in the documentation that Citus overrides max_prepared_transactions in some cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In commit postgres/postgres@b39c5272 021_twophase test was changed, and it doesn't pass with loaded Citus library any more. Apparently, when
max_prepared_transactions
is set to zero, Citus overrides it, while the test sets this GUC to zero and relies on this.Here is how I run this test. In postgres build directory:
Citus overrides
max_prepared_transactions
in functionAdjustMaxPreparedTransactions
:The comment is slightly inconsistent with the code here. If
max_prepared_transactions
is set to zero explicitly (as it is in 021_twophase test), Citus overrides it anyway.Do you think fixing Citus to pass this test worth it? I'm going to create a pull request soon, where I change AdjustMaxPreparedTransactions to really check if
max_prepared_transactions
is explicitly set by user. Please take a look.I also believe that it should be mentioned in the documentation that Citus overrides
max_prepared_transactions
in some cases.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: