Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about the resolution of training images on the Mipnerf-360 dataset. #63

Open
TY424 opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@TY424
Copy link

TY424 commented Jun 13, 2024

Hi and first of all thanks for your great work!
The training image resolution of 3DGS is 2 times downsampled (indoor) and 4 times downsampled (outdoor). The training script 'train_mip360.sh' for Scaffold-GS does not seem to have downsampling parameters. What is the training resolution in the paper?

@inspirelt
Copy link
Collaborator

We use the default settings as shown by the code: rescaling large resolution to 1.6k.

@TY424
Copy link
Author

TY424 commented Jun 14, 2024

Hello, I have another question. The outdoor scene metrics in Tables 6-8 are lower than those of 3DGS. The visualization results of these scenarios were not presented in the paper. We retrained the model, but the results were not very good. The training parameters are python /GIT/Scaffold-GS/train.py --eval -s /GIT/Scaffold-GS/data/mipnerf360/bicycle --lod 0 --gpu -1 --voxel_size 0.001 --update_init_factor 16 --appearance_dim 0 --ratio 1 --iterations 30_000 -m /SCGS/bicycle.

Test image:
00001
00006

Is it convenient to display official results?

@TY424
Copy link
Author

TY424 commented Jun 14, 2024

Is there a problem with my parameter settings?

@inspirelt
Copy link
Collaborator

We use unified parameter configuration for all mipnerf360 scenes for simplicity. For the outdoor scene with tiny and thin objects like leaf and grass, a smaller voxel size should be better. Feel free to try and welcome to share the results.

@Oops37
Copy link

Oops37 commented Dec 7, 2024

We use the default settings as shown by the code: rescaling large resolution to 1.6k.

May I ask if the Mipnerf-360 experimental results in the paper were also obtained using a resolution of 1.6k?

@inspirelt
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes.

@tongji-rkr
Copy link
Collaborator

In fact, the effect of the Scaffold-GS has great improvement compared to the vanilla Gaussian splatting, the latest results are shown in the arxiv version of Octree-GS.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants