You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
We have been collecting RF Data downloaded using the Clarius Cast API. We operate in obstetrics mode. By inspecting the .yml files, we have noticed that the transmit frequency is 2.5 HMz when scanning at a depth of less than 10 cm and 4.0 MHz when scanning at a depth of greater than 10 cm.
We have noticed that occasionally (maybe 1/50 scans), the transmit frequency will be 2.5 when we expect 4.0 or vise versa. I don't see a way to determine the frequency until the data is downloaded and processed.
One of our team members (with the same setup) claims that they are scanning at 4.0 MHz independent of depth.
A bit of a side note, it seems strange than 2.5 MHz is used in the near field and 4.0 MHz is used for the far field. I would have expected the opposite.
To Reproduce
We have not been able to reproduce this issue. We have been scanning participants in our study and occasionally the data is captured using a different frequency.
Environment:
(We are using an older version to maintain consistency for the duration of our study)
SDK version: 10.1.1
Clarius App version: 10.1.1
Let me know if this is something you have encountered before. Any advice would be appreciated.
Best wishes,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
We have been collecting RF Data downloaded using the Clarius Cast API. We operate in obstetrics mode. By inspecting the .yml files, we have noticed that the transmit frequency is 2.5 HMz when scanning at a depth of less than 10 cm and 4.0 MHz when scanning at a depth of greater than 10 cm.
We have noticed that occasionally (maybe 1/50 scans), the transmit frequency will be 2.5 when we expect 4.0 or vise versa. I don't see a way to determine the frequency until the data is downloaded and processed.
One of our team members (with the same setup) claims that they are scanning at 4.0 MHz independent of depth.
A bit of a side note, it seems strange than 2.5 MHz is used in the near field and 4.0 MHz is used for the far field. I would have expected the opposite.
To Reproduce
We have not been able to reproduce this issue. We have been scanning participants in our study and occasionally the data is captured using a different frequency.
Environment:
(We are using an older version to maintain consistency for the duration of our study)
Let me know if this is something you have encountered before. Any advice would be appreciated.
Best wishes,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: