You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One 3.5MB nxml file with 50029 mentions seems to form antecedent chains long enough to blow the stack. One CorefEventMention has a "controller" argument that is a CorefTextBoundMention that has antecedents that have antecedents that have antecedents for a long, long ways so that the stack is exhausted as the json output is constructed. I followed it down manually a couple dozen steps and don't see any circles.
I wonder whether we should be recursively outputting anything. It is leading to output files of 50GB+. Can we just output an ID for mentions that are within triggers, arguments, antecedents, paths, etc.? A mention with that ID should appear elsewhere in the list, shouldn't it? Something else can then perform the recursive search.
In Eidos this was avoided by using jsonld in which we could just point to the other mentions with links. To the extent that equivalency hashes are unique (which I think is assumed), those can be used as links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One 3.5MB nxml file with 50029 mentions seems to form antecedent chains long enough to blow the stack. One CorefEventMention has a "controller" argument that is a CorefTextBoundMention that has antecedents that have antecedents that have antecedents for a long, long ways so that the stack is exhausted as the json output is constructed. I followed it down manually a couple dozen steps and don't see any circles.
I wonder whether we should be recursively outputting anything. It is leading to output files of 50GB+. Can we just output an ID for mentions that are within triggers, arguments, antecedents, paths, etc.? A mention with that ID should appear elsewhere in the list, shouldn't it? Something else can then perform the recursive search.
In Eidos this was avoided by using jsonld in which we could just point to the other mentions with links. To the extent that equivalency hashes are unique (which I think is assumed), those can be used as links.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: