Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing selection on EM energy fraction in jets in CorrT1METJet #531

Closed
andrey-popov opened this issue Jul 24, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@andrey-popov
Copy link

The standard type 1 correction to missing pT is done using jets with the electromagnetic energy faction of less than 0.9. While it is available for the main collection of jets via branches Jet_chEmEF and Jet_neEmEF, these energy fractions are not stored in collection CorrT1METJet. I thought that maybe the jets in that collection have already been filtered, but this doesn't seem to be the case: here is the source and cut of the corresponding table, and the source collection is defined here. This problem was already reported in cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools#238.

I doubt we need the energy fractions per se in CorrT1METJet. Instead, it would be sufficient to add a boolean branch indicating whether the jet passes the selection. Alternatively, we could not store jets that don't pass the cut on the energy fraction, but this is less desirable since people might be using those jets for purposes other than the type 1 correction. I can try to prepare a pull request if needed. Please let me know.

@mariadalfonso mariadalfonso added this to the NanoAODv9 milestone Oct 24, 2020
@mariadalfonso
Copy link

@andrey-popov
was this handled ?

@lathomas
@alkaloge

@mariadalfonso mariadalfonso removed this from the NanoAODv9 milestone Jun 25, 2021
@vlimant
Copy link

vlimant commented Sep 27, 2022

closing. please ping/reopen in cms-sw if necessary

@vlimant vlimant closed this as completed Sep 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants