-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add survey-based testing signals to the map #559
Comments
I think that's a feature, not a bug. Antigen testing by one manufacturer is very different than overall testing. But even if it weren't, we are in the business of providing different measurements, not reconciling them. So I think we just need to be very descriptive. E.g. "COVID Antigen Test Positivity (Quidel)" and "COVID Test Positivity (Survey)". |
I agree it's a feature. But from a user's perspective: When would I want to know specifically antigen test positivity, vs. when would I want to know overall positivity from the survey? Does comparing the two side-by-side help me draw any useful conclusions? I know we've heard from officials that they already have too much data, so I'm wary of just putting more signals on the map without thinking of how we expect users to use them to make decisions, or if they'd be useful for that decision-making. |
These are fair questions. I guess the answers may differ across different types of users. |
is this issue still valid? |
If we add one, it should be |
Now that the symptom surveys ask respondents if they have been tested and what the results were, we should consider adding these signals to the map. There are three of interest:
I'm not sure which of these we should present and how we should present them. For example, if we show test positivity, how do we clearly distinguish that signal from the Quidel signal?
This probably requires some careful thinking about what signals are most useful for public health. @RoniRos, any opinions here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: