Cannot add a role to a contributor

[progval]

When adding a role to a contributor (not an author), I get the error Unknown field "contributor" in "contributor".

cc @hjonin

[hjonin]

It is linked to the latest modification; we have to add a contributor property to the roleFieldValidators. However, it means that it does not check if the role is associated to an author (in which case it should be schema:author to be validated) or a contributor (then contributor). Is it still OK with you?

[progval]

good catch, thanks.

we should check the properties match eventually, but for now let's only change it so it passes. Could you do it?

[megasanjay]

Adding a reply to this. Should the correct syntax be the following in this instance?

 "author": [
        {
            "id": "_:author_1",
            "type": "Person",
            "givenName": "test"
        },
        {
            "type": "schema:Role",
            "schema:author": "_:author_1",
            "schema:roleName": "test",
            "schema:startDate": "2024-08-15"
        }
    ],
    "contributor": [
        {
            "id": "_:contributor_1",
            "type": "Person",
            "givenName": "Test 2"
        },
        {
            "type": "schema:Role",
            "schema:contributor": "_:contributor_1",
            "schema:roleName": "Test3"
        }
    ]

[progval]

contributor instead of schema:contributor, but that's correct too

[megasanjay]

@progval so both are valid?

 "contributor": [
        {
            "id": "_:contributor_1",
            "type": "Person",
            "givenName": "Test 2"
        },
        {
            "type": "schema:Role",
            "schema:contributor": "_:contributor_1",
            "schema:roleName": "Test3"
        }
    ],

 "contributor": [
        {
            "id": "_:contributor_1",
            "type": "Person",
            "givenName": "Test 2"
        },
        {
            "type": "schema:Role",
            "contributor": "_:contributor_1",
            "schema:roleName": "Test3"
        }
    ]

[progval]

yes, both are semantically equivalent

[megasanjay]

yes, both are semantically equivalent

Gotcha. It's just that the validator was failing on them. I guess we shall need to wait for an update to the generator