You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The table on the Terms page on the website is quite confusing because it omits the information on which schema.org Type each term comes from. For example identifier appears in the list twice, once for schema:Thing and once for schema:Person. This info is present in the first column of the crosswalk.csv file already used to generate the page, so it should be a case of including this column when generating the table.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is partially implemented in https://github.com/codemeta/codemeta.github.io/blob/hugo/content/terms.Rmd by splitting out the Person and Thing terms into a separate table, which would help a lot with the confusion. However, it doesn't seem to be reflected in the live site. My guess is the live site hasn't been updated?
The table on the Terms page on the website is quite confusing because it omits the information on which schema.org Type each term comes from. For example
identifier
appears in the list twice, once forschema:Thing
and once forschema:Person
. This info is present in the first column of the crosswalk.csv file already used to generate the page, so it should be a case of including this column when generating the table.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: