Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Directed edges #183

Open
lizmcconnell opened this issue Jul 6, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Directed edges #183

lizmcconnell opened this issue Jul 6, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@lizmcconnell
Copy link

lizmcconnell commented Jul 6, 2017

From focus group on July 7, 2017: Would like an option to generate directed edges. This could be a configural option in the Architect where if "directional" is turned on, arrows would show up on edges. Likely the first node you click is "from" and the second is "to." @michellebee

@jthrilly
Copy link
Member

jthrilly commented Apr 27, 2018

Further discussion indicated that this is still a desired feature, although there is disagreement about the nature of the implementation.

At the very least, we need to avoid assuming that ties are symmetrical in our internal application logic.

Currently, we make this assumption in the sociogram when linking nodes. This will be revised when we implement directed edge creation.

Directed edges will be specified as a top level property of the interview protocol.

Relevant implementation issues:

@jthrilly jthrilly added this to the Alpha.4 milestone Apr 27, 2018
@jthrilly jthrilly modified the milestones: Alpha.4 - Gresley, Alpha.5 May 28, 2018
@jthrilly jthrilly modified the milestones: Alpha.5, Alpha.6 Jul 12, 2018
@jthrilly jthrilly added NC and removed NC labels Sep 14, 2018
@jthrilly jthrilly removed this from the Alpha.6 milestone Sep 14, 2018
@jthrilly jthrilly added this to the Beta-stretch milestone Apr 5, 2019
@jthrilly jthrilly moved this to Large Features in Network Canvas Aug 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants