-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 783
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add --multi-arch=sparse:… #1935
Comments
Yes, that script looks good, with the current format of the I don’t see that a “merge” operation of two I think we’d want something like A counterpart would be something like (To correctly prioritize this in the business context, please file this in Jira.) |
When the format is specified as "dir", copy the manifest specified in the source digest and merge it into the final image directory. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS and allow them to run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
When the format is specified as "dir", copy the manifest specified in the source digest and merge it into the final image directory. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS and allow them to run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
When the format is specified as "dir", copy the manifest specified in the source digest and merge it into the final image directory. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS. Then, they can run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
With the format is specified as `dir` now, we can copy the manifest specified in the source digest and merge it into the final image directory. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS. Then, they can run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
With the format is specified as `dir` now, we can copy the manifest specified in the source digest and merge it into the final image directory. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS. Then, they can run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
With the local format being `dir` now, we can copy the manifest specified in the source digest. We can then merge the list manifest into the image directory when requested by the user. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS. Then, they can run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
With the local format being `dir` now, we can copy the manifest specified in the source digest. We can then merge the list manifest into the image directory when requested by the user. The effect of this is that the digest of the final image in the container registry will match the manifest digest. This enables users to specify an image's manifest digest or a multi-image manifest list digest which will be preserved in the container store on the final OS. Then, they can run the container using the same digest that was specified in the input. Updated the module docstring with details on the storage format. Partially copied from the containers input docstring. This may become a feature of Skopeo (or other tooling) in the future. See containers/skopeo#1935
dir:
with an index-only
dir:
A friendly reminder that this issue had no activity for 30 days. |
This is partially related to containers/image#1874.
Our use case (Image Builder / osbuild) requires transferring a container and its manifests (and particularly the manifest list) using a portable format that doesn't affect the image itself. We also don't want to be downloading all the images for all the architectures just to get the manifest list. In the end, it should be possible to run the container by referencing its manifest list digest without needing access to the original registry (or even an internet connection).
@mtrmac suggested using
--multi-arch=index-only
to store the manifest list in adir:
and then getting the image separately, which means eventually, these would need to be merged. I've used the following script to accomplish this, but I'd like confirmation that this is the right way.Using Fedora 37 on Quay.io as an example
To verify that it worked:
sudo skopeo copy --preserve-digests dir:container-archive/merged 'containers-storage:[overlay@/var/lib/containers/storage+/run/containers/storage]quay.io/fedora/fedora@sha256:176454f0e89d7bda8b8b577bfd855f5cb3854234d781855baef82cb057b0529e' sudo podman run --rm --pull=never quay.io/fedora/fedora@sha256:176454f0e89d7bda8b8b577bfd855f5cb3854234d781855baef82cb057b0529e uname -a
runs the container without needing to pull anything.
Given the current
dir:
format, do you see any issues with this way of merging?Is this something that can be added to the tooling (particularly, skopeo, either as part of the copy command or separately as a "merge" command?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: