You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
ExtensionField is theoretically covered by the bilinear group tests, but should also be tested in the RingTests
None of the new Vector type classes have any test coverage and the other cartesian stuff also doesn't
The boolean ring structure has no test coverage
RingGroup has no test coverage, but perhaps not necessary here
The exception condition for GroupElement#pow(RingElement) is never hit
For some reason none of the converter classes have coverage although they are tested in our ConverterTest.
Boolean expression stuff has no coverage
For some reason some stuff that is definitely tested has 0% test coverage such as our representation converters, or RingElement#mul(BigInteger), Ring#extendedEuclideanAlgorithm(List<RingElement>).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to have tests for the following methods (or investigate why there is no test coverage in case IntelliJ is wrong):
HashIntoZnAdditiveGroup
andHashIntoZp
have no coverage at all (although latter should be covered byHashIntoZn
)PolynomialRing.Polynomial#scalarProduct(Polynomial)
ExtensionField
is theoretically covered by the bilinear group tests, but should also be tested in theRingTests
Vector
type classes have any test coverage and the other cartesian stuff also doesn'tRingGroup
has no test coverage, but perhaps not necessary hereGroupElement#pow(RingElement)
is never hitConverterTest
.For some reason some stuff that is definitely tested has 0% test coverage such as our representation converters, or
RingElement#mul(BigInteger)
,Ring#extendedEuclideanAlgorithm(List<RingElement>)
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: