-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IEM Reanalysis too coarse for WEPP usage in the mountains #212
Comments
Some debugging cruft here for our CLI file of interest crude yearly means
I think 2015 was a year of interest, for prism this is grid cell i=231, j=377 , PRISM has an average high of 16.2C and low of 1.6C, yikes. It also has 656 mm of precip, whereas DEP has 605.9, so that's not horrible, like temperature. |
The good news is that I had a lucid dream last night about this situation and believe now that I do not need to increase IEMRE's grid resolution just yet. The major issue was a lack of using high-res inputs to drive the 0.125 degree analysis. Feverishly cranking knobs to get a new downstream assessment of the situation. |
At the team call today, a comparison was shown with DEP's 0.01x0.01 climate files performing very poorly in the mountains. At issue was temperatures being too warm and not producing enough snow within the WEPP algorithm for snow generation. It seems clear to me that the 0.125x0.125 IEMRE domain is too coarse for provision of temperature information. I have great gnashing of teeth at the moment resolving how I wish to proceed. Step 1 is creating this issue 😆
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: