Skip to content

Is it possible to enhance the static site generator? #125

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

A summary of what we have discussed via email:

  • If an auto-generated htaccess file is not flexible and sometimes not supported, then there's no need to include it in static output.
  • Windows doesn’t like the colon character in the URL, therefor fail fast with error 500 and in the future we could support Windows file system to make Windows user happy.
  • HTML pages without html-suffix work on all tested web servers out-of-the-box, with an exception of Microsoft's IIS which is considered an unsupported web server for now.
  • Pages with footnotes create unnecessary files, where file name contains "#fn", something to be fixed.

Let's see if users report any problems. Please comment if something is wr…

Replies: 11 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by annaesvensson
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants
Converted from issue

This discussion was converted from issue #125 on December 27, 2020 00:37.