You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm wondering if it's possible, via the config or some other ways, to have the following behavior:
When there a conflict (the same file was edited on both the initiator and the target), instead of hiding the backup copy in .osync_workdir/backup/, to have both copies of the file kept in place, by changing the filename.
For example, if there's a conflict on toto.txt, the one that osync normally keeps is kept as toto.txt, but the backup is kept as toto-conflicted copy 2021-04-24 2359.txt, and that backup is kept in the same folder, next to toto.txt
Is that possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi
This is a question (not a bug).
I'm wondering if it's possible, via the config or some other ways, to have the following behavior:
When there a conflict (the same file was edited on both the initiator and the target), instead of hiding the backup copy in
.osync_workdir/backup/
, to have both copies of the file kept in place, by changing the filename.For example, if there's a conflict on
toto.txt
, the one that osync normally keeps is kept astoto.txt
, but the backup is kept astoto-conflicted copy 2021-04-24 2359.txt
, and that backup is kept in the same folder, next tototo.txt
Is that possible?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: