Gain agreement on proposed data model changes for Vet Center CAP data

[kmariepat-cityfriends]

Background

Review the following cards for past work done on determining this model:

• Lighthouse discovery: Vet Center CAP data Lighthouse discovery: Vet Center CAP data #4410
• CMS - Lighthouse: gain agreement on proposed data model changes CMS - Lighthouse: gain agreement on proposed data model changes #10869

Acceptance Criteria

• I expect changes are made to the CAP data model to have parity with the model outlined in this card: CMS - Lighthouse: push more facility service data #4769
• Align with Lighthouse about the proposed data model determined in the above AC
• Align with Lighthouse about send method for CAP data (this card does not include creating that end point which is created by Lighthouse)
• Gain agreement with Lighthouse about lat/long:
• Do we push if we have no lat/long; I expect that we can not push if the lat lon is not present and that we can not publish the node if the lat lon is not provided.
  (if no geo-coordinates it wouldn't be valid with the lighthouse data model)
• Do we push CAPS with unpublished data? I expect that we do not push if the node is not published.
  (this differs from other node, in this case the node is the source of truth of everything and the CAP is not launched until it is published)

---

• Shutting down a CAP?
• I expect the lighthouse team confirms the endpoint approach with the facilities dev working on this card
  add, update and delete endpoint?
  OR one endpoint?
  OR something else

[swirtSJW]

Delivered to Lighthouse for review here https://dsva.slack.com/archives/C02BTJTDFTN/p1684729527218149

[swirtSJW]

This is now waiting on Lighthouse to review usability of field names

[jilladams]

Notes from 6/5 lighthouse meeting re: status:

• Swirt pushed sample data in progress, over the weekend, Adam is taking a look currently
  • Also looking for better field name, work with Dana
• Need lighthouse to determine the end-point approach for update/add/delete of CAPs (Likely Adam)
  • Schema was proposed a while ago, at any point we can act on enacting that schema
    ^^ These tasks will satisfy this ticket.

Still identified as a post-V1 effort. Ticket will roll to Sprint 86.

[swirtSJW]

This is the new PR from the branch. #16837
It is largely feature complete pending Lighthouse giving us an actual endpoint and coordinating / testing with LH.

[Agile6MSkinner]

@davidmpickett @omahane Is this dead now that swirt is gone or should we revive it?

[davidmpickett]

I think that this is a still a when, not an if, question.

I'm not sure if this is an example of something that is possible on Lighthouse Facilities API v1 that wasn't possible on v0 and just hasn't been prioritized, or if it's blocked until Lighthouse v2. Either way, it's a core piece of the long term strategy for Facilities data. The PR may be stale, but the work is still relevant and has high Veteran value. It would enable surfacing about ~450 facilities in Facility Locator.

The approach here will likely also inform the #15366 as they both involve making Drupal the source of truth for Lighthouse of basic facility data (currently we're only source of truth to them for operating status and service details)

I haven't been super looped in to the Lighthouse convos, others can probably give a more accurate recap of the blockers/ next steps

[jilladams]

Card for this in the Lighthouse sync board: https://trello.com/c/ciZEObA6/1-vet-center-community-access-point-push-receive-partially-blocked-on-endpoint. Blocked on Lighthouse capacity to pick it up / define the endpoint we will push to.