-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create concrete research tasks as issues: text #445
Comments
Created issues (to be addressed in roughly that order):
|
@cpranav93 would you, please, have a quick look? It's not the best candidate issue for review, but a second pair of eyes is always good. |
Another interesting research task could be to look in to the best methods for comparing two explained instances. Are relevance maps a good suit? How do we score the relevance maps, etc? I am not sure if this was already done before, in which case, please ignore the comment. |
I have left a couple of comments as relevant on certain issues. Otherwise it looks like a great break down of the tasks to be done. |
I hope some of the literature review by @WillemSpek will give answer to some of these. To the relevance maps as a good suit as well, but for now I think it's nice to limit the scope only on them as they are the main output of dianna. @cpranav93 not sure, what you mean by how do we score them, when I tried to define the quantitative experiments I'm thinking of the actual values of the relevancies which are encoded by the colors in the relevance maps visualization. Thanks for the comments per issue, I'll have a look at each! |
The comments by @cpranav93 for some of the issues are nice suggestions for structuring the work and for additional questions subject to available given the time. |
Start from issue dianna-ai/dianna-exploration#187.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: