You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are a few repetitions of identifiers between keys and values: description: description. Since _* are reserved by lidy, we could use _ as a special value to indicate that the value of the entry should be checked by the rule whose name corresponds to the key. This would allow to write the above schema as follows:
I just came across a similar use case: namespaced self-identifying parameters.
I believe that namespaced self-identifying parameters will be the more common use case of the two, so the syntax for SIP (self-identifying parameters) should take it into account. Using NSIP (namespaced-self-identifying parameters) helps to refactor with confidence.
The OSASIS Tosca lidy schema has the following type:
There are a few repetitions of identifiers between keys and values:
description: description
. Since_*
are reserved by lidy, we could use_
as a special value to indicate that the value of the entry should be checked by the rule whose name corresponds to the key. This would allow to write the above schema as follows:@treivax Does it look good to you?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: