Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should 1.1.1 have been 1.2.0? #100

Open
evgeni opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Should 1.1.1 have been 1.2.0? #100

evgeni opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@evgeni
Copy link

evgeni commented Mar 15, 2023

Looking at the diff 1.1.0...1.1.1 I it changes the minimum Foreman version, so that doesn't sound like a "patch" release? :)
@kamils-iRonin
Copy link
Contributor

indeed, @danielwieberneit can we release 1.2.0 instead of 1.1.1? there is also a mention of 1.2 in the compatibility matrix https://github.com/dm-drogeriemarkt/foreman_netbox/blob/master/README.md?plain=1#L13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@evgeni @kamils-iRonin