Which is better? HTML or MarkDown? #9342
-
Hi I have 3 questions: 1- In your opinion, which is better to store the texts of the site blog in the database? HTML or MarkDown? 2- If use HTML, does the high volume of stored characters slow down the retrieval of information from the database? 3- If use MarkDown, will converting it to HTML on the server side cause additional requests? Thank yoy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
I would use Markdown for storage! The generated HTML should be cached! The pros of storing Markdown are:
HTML is faster, just get it and send it. But also, when you must think about the Rendering Time, you will always need some form of caching! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I would use Markdown for storage!
The generated HTML should be cached!
The pros of storing Markdown are:
HTML is faster, just get it and send it. But also, when you must think about the Rendering Time, you will always need some form of caching!