You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should we replace inih with an alternative INI parser? Motivation is as follows:
inih uses a New BSD license, but I'd prefer if this project was 100% public domain
a header-only alternative would make succade dependency free and installation easier for some users
Of course, there is also a drawback to the header-only approach: succade will increase in size. With inih, succade doesn't need to include any INI parsing code and instead uses the shared library. Seeing, however, how some distributions do not have a package for inih (example, Arch Linux, see #33), I'm pretty tempted to trade a larger binary for easier installation.
Not quite sure about this one yet, let's see what alternatives are out there. A quick scan brings up simple-ini-reader and ini.h as possible candidates, but there are more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should we replace
inih
with an alternative INI parser? Motivation is as follows:inih
uses a New BSD license, but I'd prefer if this project was 100% public domainOf course, there is also a drawback to the header-only approach: succade will increase in size. With
inih
, succade doesn't need to include any INI parsing code and instead uses the shared library. Seeing, however, how some distributions do not have a package forinih
(example, Arch Linux, see #33), I'm pretty tempted to trade a larger binary for easier installation.Not quite sure about this one yet, let's see what alternatives are out there. A quick scan brings up
simple-ini-reader
andini.h
as possible candidates, but there are more.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: