Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rethink per-DB configuration storage #142

Open
eapache opened this issue Sep 25, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Rethink per-DB configuration storage #142

eapache opened this issue Sep 25, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@eapache
Copy link
Owner

eapache commented Sep 25, 2015

It might be easier to manage in combination with the global config if it's stored in a separately editable JSON blob .starscope.json beside the DB instead of inside the DB itself.

eapache referenced this issue Oct 19, 2015
This is more convenient, and we no longer run into weird symbol/string issues
now that we aren't forcing all hash-keys to symbols when loading the JSON.

Also more strictly validate the DB in some tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant