-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for GCC optimized builds in RISCV SiFive u74mc architecture #4641
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
easybuild/toolchains/compiler/gcc.py
Outdated
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ class Gcc(Compiler): | |||
(systemtools.POWER, systemtools.POWER_LE): 'mcpu=native', | |||
(systemtools.X86_64, systemtools.AMD): 'march=native', # implies -mtune=native | |||
(systemtools.X86_64, systemtools.INTEL): 'march=native', # implies -mtune=native | |||
(systemtools.RISCV64, systemtools.SIFIVE): 'march=rv64gc mtune=sifive-7-series', # flags specified in archspec |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@julianmorillo Hmmm, is systemtools.SIFIVE
fine-grained enough here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@boegel Probably not, if you consider all the possible mtune
options in: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/RISC-V-Options.html.
But, on the other hand, this is what it is currently being used in archspec: https://github.com/archspec/archspec-json/blob/b0c1872de59fe8c9902f55f97699d1b02b5cfe9c/cpu/microarchitectures.json#L3461
Also, there is no way to obtain more fine-grained information on such systems (at least not on the arriesgado machines I have been testing).
So I believe that for the moment this granularity should suffice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In that case, it's probably not a good idea to add this to EasyBuild by default, since if there are other SiFive models later, we would need to change/fix this somehow anyway?
Note that you can configure EasyBuild easily to use a particular set of flags instead of what it uses by default via --optarch
(or $EASYBUILD_OPTARCH
), see https://docs.easybuild.io/controlling-compiler-optimization-flags/#controlling_compiler_optimization_flags_optarch_flags
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@boegel As you requested, the detection is now more fine-grained. The compiler flags are only applied when we are in a SiFive U74-MC processor.
…that vendor constant is like cpu_model.
No description provided.