Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
My opinion: For 17: To have the widest support as possible. Against 17:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My opinion is as posted on the platform's issue: and we can confirm the voting status of the spec committee in the following archive: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Supporting of two LTS versions at the same time will lead to increased efforts to maintain the code base. This is a step back I think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@dmatej the way you designed the vote only allows for one version to be chosen while the question is about plural JDK versions. Will you be able redo the question to use the boxes so that the choice of both JDKs are available? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Final solution - GlassFish 8 will be based on JDK21, and we will release special version based on JDK17 which will pass all TCK tests, but will not be recommended for production use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As there is still ongoing discussion about supported Java versions of Jakarta EE 11, we are asking our community about the opinion, especially active committers.
GlassFish 7 supports Java 11+, preferred is Java 17. Implements Jakarta EE 10.
What about GlassFish 8? Can you add your thoughts?
Results are not obligatory, but we want to know your opinion.
13 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions