-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
presentation.qmd
129 lines (101 loc) · 4.11 KB
/
presentation.qmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
---
title: Reproducibility Standards in Economics (and beyond)
subtitle: JHU FOSSProF Summative Event
format:
clean-revealjs:
self-contained: true
html-math-method:
method: mathjax
url: "https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js"
author:
- name: Alan Lujan
orcid: 0000-0002-5289-7054
email: [email protected]
affiliations: Johns Hopkins University AAP
- name: Chris Carroll
orcid: 0000-0003-3732-9312
email: [email protected]
affiliations: Johns Hopkins University
date: last-modified
---
## [REMARK](https://github.com/econ-ark/REMARK) Motivation
- Econ lags in reproducibility practices
- State of field: for _published_ papers
- `.zip` archive has *some files*
- rarely works 'out of the box'
- Top-5 journals have a 'data editor'
- Very expensive
- Excellent barrier to competition
- Data $\neq$ results
## [Econ-ARK](https://econ-ark.org) REMARK solutions
- _Standards_ for reproducibility of compute
- self-contained and complete projects
- executable on any modern computer
- Emphasis on:
- minimally good code
- enforced algorithmically
- would be huge improvement
- "ChatGPT, fix my documentation"
- explicit claims ("Risk Aversion: [2.5,3.5]")
- standardized metadata
## So Far: [About 23+3 REMARKs](https://econ-ark.org/materials)
- Many replicating canonical papers
- Three new ones created for FossProF:
- [Imai_Keane (2004) by John Green](https://github.com/JohnRGreen/ImaiKeane_replication)
- [DeNardi (2004) by Ashish Kumar](https://github.com/ashishk87/DeNardi_2004_replication)
- [Aiyagari (1994) by Adam Edwards](https://github.com/Adam-Edwards-JHU/Aiyagari1994QJE)
- Paul Romer:
- This is the future of academic publishing
## _Jointly_ Reproducible: Code and Math and Text
- Solved: most computational aspects
- [Docker containers](https://docker.com) for universality
- Linux, Windows, MacOS, AWS, ...
- version control (git/[GitHub](https://github.com)) = ownership
- [cff references](https://citation-file-format.github.io/) make it findable/indexable
- [Zenodo](https://zenodo.org): independent "release" archiving
## Math and Text _with_ Code?
- [$\LaTeX$](https://www.tug.org/texlive/) is standard for text, but...
- definitely *not lightweight*
- no dynamically executable content
- Now: tenuous connection _between_ text and code
- "where is equation 18 implemented"?
- in a gestalt of interactions
- Future:
- ["this math: implemented by this code"](https://econ-ark.org/materials/bufferstocktheory)
## FOSSProF $\rightarrow$ [Curvenote](https://curvenote.com/)
Funding let us hire open source contractor
- To do things we could not do
### At our direction:
- Integrated [MyST Markdown](https://mystmd.org/) into REMARK
- Filled gaps in tools to integrate text, math, and code
- Improved $\LaTeX$ $\rightarrow$ MyST engine
- Tools required for some of our REMARKs
### [Link to FOSSProF Final Report](https://econ-ark.github.io/FOSSProF/)
## Curvenote: $\LaTeX$
![](CNlatexImprovements.png)
## Curvenote: Computation
![](CNexamples.png)
## Journal of Open Source Economics
<a href="https://josecon.curve.space/articles/018dc338-e64c-7c68-9b37-4f3d092f4252" target="_blank">
<img src="compute.png" />
</a>
## Not Specific to Economics!
- conceived for projects using [Econ-ARK](https://docs.econ-ark.org)
- ... but doesn't require Econ-ARK
- Not bound to economics *in any way*
## Rebranding: REMARK $\rightarrow$ SCI-PASS
- **S**cholarly **C**ommunication **I**nfrastructure for **P**ublishing and **A**rchiving **S**cientific **S**oftware
- Ambition:
- universal standard for repr compute
- nothing now exists (we've looked)
- Also short for “**sci**entific **pass**port”
- portability/sharing of research outputs
## Long-Term Goal: ISO standard
- Adoptable by journals, libraries, archives ...
- Existing software standards got started this way
- Somebody needed it for their own purposes
- Members of our team:
- SB: "Information Science" PhD
- connection to archivists, librarians
- AS: Economics PhD
- Vetted ISO software standards for Oz