Perfectionise the GitHub community profile

[matuskalas]

Add missing community standards.

See e.g. https://github.com/edamontology/edamontology/community etc. and general GitHub sites about decreasing the community friction

[joncison]

We already have a Contributors Guide:
http://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributors_guide.html

For Code of Conduct we could build upon:
http://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/governance.html

(which anyway needs to changed as per discussions early in the year)

[joncison]

@hmenager, @matuskalas : along these lines, I'd like to now invite all users of the EDAM to join the (now refactored and better) EDAM Steering Group (http://edamontologydocs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/governance.html). This is more or less the last thing re governance to settle.

Could you please suggest a list of projects and appropriate people (name+email) to contact, that you know about? Please use mail if we don't want to publish email addresses here.

cc @veitveit FHI

[joncison]

@hmenager and @matuskalas - I'd very much like to settle the EDAM Governance, by inviting representatives of groups using EDAM to join the Steering Group, so I can do the invites and report on / reinvigorate this in Aug/Sep. Could you please ping me (by email) some suggestions? Thanks!

[joncison]

This issue was moved to edamontology/edamontologyDocs#14

[matuskalas]

This applies also to this repo, not only to docs. Partially fixed, but more to do later, given the capacity

[joncison]

Hi @matuskalas - what's left to do here? It would be good to finalise a list of def. actions on the repo especially.

[AnkitaxPriya]

Hi @joncison, according to the community standards a pull request template must be added. I can help with that.

[matuskalas]

Dear @AnkitaxPriya, thank you so much for your offer, and sorry for not replying immediately. We are very happy that you want to contribute, and adding a pull request template is an excellent idea, highly appreciated! 🙌🏽

I created a specific issue for this purpose, #615. Please comment there and I'll assign it to you.
(I haven't marked it yet "good first issue", so that you can have more peace working it out before too many other contributors add their comments😉)