We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This lets you capture the data very quickly, and with much more precision than currently available.
#include "ch32v003fun.h" #include <stdio.h> #define ITERATIONS 1 #define SERIALPLOT volatile uint32_t ldelta; uint32_t llast; void AWU_IRQHandler( void ) __attribute__((section(".text.vector_handler"))) __attribute__((interrupt)); void AWU_IRQHandler( void ) { uint32_t l = SysTick->CNT; ldelta = (l - llast); llast = l; EXTI->INTFR = EXTI_Line9; } int main() { SystemInit(); // enable power interface module clock RCC->APB1PCENR |= RCC_APB1Periph_PWR | RCC_APB1Periph_WWDG; // enable low speed oscillator (LSI) RCC->RSTSCKR |= RCC_LSION; while ((RCC->RSTSCKR & RCC_LSIRDY) == 0) {} // enable AutoWakeUp event EXTI->FTENR |= EXTI_Line9; EXTI->INTENR |= EXTI_Line9; // configure AWU prescaler and configure AWU window comparison value // /16 /(63+1) ~= 120Hz PWR->AWUPSC = PWR_AWU_Prescaler_8; PWR->AWUWR = 63; PWR->AWUCSR = (1 << 1); // AWUEN // enable interrupt NVIC_EnableIRQ( AWU_IRQn ); uint32_t t; uint32_t lastt = TIM1->CNT; while(1) { // Wait for data to become available. uint32_t printtime = 0; while( !( printtime = ldelta ) ); ldelta = 0; printf("%d\n", printtime ); //raw_to_temperature(count)); } }
Just tested it at my desk here.
Also, I am seeing significant variation per part.
Additionally flex your PCB
Quescent at 25 C: 189900 Diagonal Torsion: 1888537 Inverse Torsion: 191050
Just using my little PCBs I had at my desk applying about 1 N*cm of force to the PCB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll look into it tonight, thank you for the input!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
This lets you capture the data very quickly, and with much more precision than currently available.
Just tested it at my desk here.
Also, I am seeing significant variation per part.
Additionally flex your PCB
Quescent at 25 C: 189900
Diagonal Torsion: 1888537
Inverse Torsion: 191050
Just using my little PCBs I had at my desk applying about 1 N*cm of force to the PCB.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: