You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The tooltip currently shows the Active,Value and Target labels in this order.
I'd like to suggest to change the order to have the most important information first and the other later: Value,Target,Active or Value,Active,Target
Moving the Value as the first information on the tooltip makes it a bit more prominent, and gives less of the impression that the Active value is the current important value on the chart.
If possible, I'd also like to suggest to fade out a bit the style of the Active element, or make the Value more prominent (bold?)
Also the naming could be reviewed for the active Active -> Current.
I think it is ok to re-organise the elements and I agree that Active, as a word, might need to be evaluated in favour of Current or something similar.
Visually speaking, I am proposing two slightly different options with a lighter and bolder role for the Value numbers. Which one do you think would work better?
@nickofthyme I've chatted with @gvnmagni and your solution is fine for us, let's go with that.
The terms value and current are hardcoded and localized, where instead target can be customized in lens appearance panel.
The tooltip currently shows the
Active
,Value
andTarget
labels in this order.I'd like to suggest to change the order to have the most important information first and the other later:
Value
,Target
,Active
orValue
,Active
,Target
Moving the
Value
as the first information on the tooltip makes it a bit more prominent, and gives less of the impression that theActive
value is the current important value on the chart.If possible, I'd also like to suggest to fade out a bit the style of the
Active
element, or make theValue
more prominent (bold?)Also the naming could be reviewed for the active
Active
->Current
.cc @gvnmagni
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: