Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Serverless]: Troubleshooting page should also include some Serverless specific troubleshooting tips #4454

Open
KOTungseth opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@KOTungseth
Copy link
Contributor

Serverless Docs

Elastic Observability Serverless

Description

We may want to rework these sections to include troubleshooting scenarios that are specific to Serverless (or at least include some examples that are not just core Observability troubleshooting).

Original issue: elastic/docs-content#81

@colleenmcginnis
Copy link
Contributor

@KOTungseth @ppf2 are there any Serverless-specific problems that Observability users are currently experiencing? I don't think we've seen any come through in issues or other feedback channels.

@KOTungseth
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've been unable to find Observability Serverless-specific content we should add to the Docs.

@ppf2 do you know who would have more information?

@ppf2
Copy link
Member

ppf2 commented Dec 18, 2024

For non-Serverless, we have:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/observability/current/apm-troubleshoot-apm.html

For Serverless we have:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/serverless/current/observability-apm-troubleshooting.html

The Serverless documentation has some duplicate information and is a reduced set. For example, take response codes from APM as an example:

These differences are likely expected because 403 are specific to RUM and RUM is not yet available on Serverless and 503s may no longer be an issue with autoscaling on Serverless ...

Though I think some of the non-Serverless common problems may apply to Serverless as well but it's not captured in Serverless documentation. I can imagine (for example) that things like "Field limit exceeded" and "Fields are not searchable" would still be applicable to Serverless.

cc: @lucabelluccini

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants