From 3baefb747fe0762d0b308dc0975f279c7e049195 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Lu=C3=ADs=20Avelino=20Rel=C3=B3gio?= Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 15:58:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update fswatch.texi Typo in Documentation #325 --- fswatch/doc/fswatch.texi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fswatch/doc/fswatch.texi b/fswatch/doc/fswatch.texi index 6af06ae1..6ba85175 100644 --- a/fswatch/doc/fswatch.texi +++ b/fswatch/doc/fswatch.texi @@ -1969,13 +1969,13 @@ certain integer @math{k}, then the numeric value of a set of event flags is univocally determined. To check whether a given event flag is present when processing -@command{fswatch} output, iti s sufficient to check whether its bit is +@command{fswatch} output, it is sufficient to check whether it's bit is set to 1 in the event value. Let's suppose we want to check whether the event flag whose value is @math{e} is present in a record whose flag numerical value is @math{n}. If the result @math{r} of @tex -$$ r = e \wedge b $$ +$$ r = e \wedge n $$ @end tex @noindent