You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So should the readme be amended to follow RFC 3986 convention or we always want the port number?
The validator at https://validate.eosnation.io currently follwows RFC 3986, which is not aligned to the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
matthewdarwin
changed the title
should the port numbers or not on API endpoints
Show the port numbers or not on API endpoints when port number is 'standard'
Jul 6, 2018
I think for congruency they should be left on. In any case if any user or machine navigates to the url it will strip them but for machines it'll serve as a delimiter for standardized URLs
The readme specifies that port numbers should be specified on API endpoints:
api_endpoint: EOSIO HTTP endpoint http://host:port
ssl_endpoint: EOSIO HTTPS endpoint https://host:port
However, when it is a standard port (80 or 443), the normal convention is to leave it off, when it is the standard port (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.2.3)
So should the readme be amended to follow RFC 3986 convention or we always want the port number?
The validator at https://validate.eosnation.io currently follwows RFC 3986, which is not aligned to the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: