-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support schema:domain/rangeIncludes #12
Comments
Looking in the source, I don't think I can modify OWLAPI to support these Schema props, so params Now looking at https://github.com/essepuntato/LODE/blob/master/src/main/webapp/extraction.xsl. |
fixed by #13 |
See #13. |
eccenca/jod#15 asks the same props to be handled in 3 namespaces: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
rdfs:domain/range are monomorphic (they bind a property to only one class), whereas schema:domain/rangeIncludes are polymorphic, so they are better suited for ontology reuse.
See OnToology/OnToology#383 for more details, including an explanation by the Schema people.
What I'm looking for is to:
Of course, OWL reasoning won't work on them, but that's ok for my purposes.
@essepuntato what do you think of this idea? I'll look to implement it in LODE, but want to hear your thoughts so as not to create a code split.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: