-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New practice exercises available to add #714
Comments
We have an existing system for allowing students to run bonus tests: https://github.com/exercism/julia/blob/main/exercises/practice/circular-buffer/runtests.jl#L141-L265 |
The |
Right. Okay that makes sense then. |
The next exercise (binary-search-tree) is available for review |
New practice exercise two-bucket is now available for review |
New practice exercise dominoes is now available for review |
New practice exercise change is now available for review |
New practice exercise game-of-life is now available for review |
New practice exercise wordy is now available for review. |
New practice exercise matrix is now available for review |
New practice exercise palindrome-products is now available for review |
New practice exercise perceptron is available for review. |
Closing issue as all practice exercises have been reviewed. |
I've made a couple of practice exercises which are in this fork and only need reviewing. If someone would like to use the code to add them to the track, feel free to take as much of it as you would like and modify it as you please (the only thing I ask is that I not be listed as author/contributor). The list of available exercises is below. Those with a PR open have a link.
New practice exercises from Exercism problem-specifications
The above are made according to the problem specifications. However, I may include a file
supplemental.jl
in the.meta
folder with alternate/extra testing (to be used as desired). The file might also contain other potentially useful code I've written along the way.New practice exercises from scratch
The above will likely need a more thorough review.
If there are any questions about any of the code, I'd be happy to participate in the review process.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: