We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Has it been a deliberate choice to treat the terms tag and element as synonyms in the spec and the grammar?
jsx/spec.emu
Lines 66 to 71 in d614ce7
I find this lack of distinction confusing when teaching JSX.
I think the following would be more clear and in line with the terminology used for HTML (e.g. Document.getElementsByTagName vs Document.getElementsByName):
JSXElement : JSXSelfClosingTag JSXOpeningTag JSXChildren? JSXClosingTag JSXSelfClosingTag : `<` JSXTagName JSXAttributes? `/` `>`
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Has it been a deliberate choice to treat the terms tag and element as synonyms in the spec and the grammar?
jsx/spec.emu
Lines 66 to 71 in d614ce7
I find this lack of distinction confusing when teaching JSX.
I think the following would be more clear and in line with the terminology used for HTML (e.g. Document.getElementsByTagName vs Document.getElementsByName):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: