You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
Follow the paper, in Evaluation Setup and Results -> Unseen-Mentions dataset -> Influence of number of candidates retrieved
Starting from the results of the recall@64 and the accuracy of the cross encoder for the Unseen-Mentions dataset, how is the overall accuracy calculated? Thank you so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Follow the paper, in Evaluation Setup and Results -> Unseen-Mentions dataset -> Influence of number of candidates retrieved
Starting from the results of the recall@64 and the accuracy of the cross encoder for the Unseen-Mentions dataset, how is the overall accuracy calculated? Thank you so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: