You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
hello,
in the update_bn_stats_gpu function,
workspace.FeedBlob(
'gpu{}/'.format(i) + bn_layer + '_bn_rm',
np.array(self._meanX_dict[bn_layer], dtype=np.float32),
meanX of 200 * batch_size * num_gpu training samples is computed, then rewrite the mem of bn_layer + '_bn_rm'.
so why not use the running mean accumulated during training?
why the mean computed during COMPUTE_PRECISE_BN switch is more precise?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
hello,
in the update_bn_stats_gpu function,
workspace.FeedBlob(
'gpu{}/'.format(i) + bn_layer + '_bn_rm',
np.array(self._meanX_dict[bn_layer], dtype=np.float32),
meanX of 200 * batch_size * num_gpu training samples is computed, then rewrite the mem of bn_layer + '_bn_rm'.
so why not use the running mean accumulated during training?
why the mean computed during COMPUTE_PRECISE_BN switch is more precise?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: