You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it be a good idea to provide the ability to create more roles than just owner & member?
The logic on Kavach's end would still be the same that it would not care about any other role apart from what owner does. owner is the only role that would have access to create, update & delete other users & roles.
But from other applications when a Kavach user profile is retrieved, we would send all the roles the user is part of and let applications decide on the logic on how to go about using it.
This way, Kavach could be used in simple applications without having to implement RBAC from scratch within the applications.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Would it be a good idea to provide the ability to create more roles than just owner & member?
The logic on Kavach's end would still be the same that it would not care about any other role apart from what
owner
does.owner
is the only role that would have access to create, update & delete otherusers
&roles
.But from other applications when a Kavach user profile is retrieved, we would send all the roles the user is part of and let applications decide on the logic on how to go about using it.
This way, Kavach could be used in simple applications without having to implement RBAC from scratch within the applications.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions