You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
As stated in the official documentation https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/s3/AmazonS3.html#deleteObject-java.lang.String-java.lang.String- and as addressed by issue #97 the delete API has a different behaviour than the counterpart on the official client.
Using the findify library, attempting to delete an object that does not exist will result in a 404 object not found AmazonS3Exception.
Whereas the official client in the same exact situation would return a success response.
in the mentioned issue i saw a pull request that addresses the described problem, would it be possible to merge it? Or would it be possible for you to allign the behaviour of this specific case to the behaviour that the official client would have in the same situation?
Hoping for a reply,
Thank you in advance.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
As stated in the official documentation https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSJavaSDK/latest/javadoc/com/amazonaws/services/s3/AmazonS3.html#deleteObject-java.lang.String-java.lang.String- and as addressed by issue #97 the delete API has a different behaviour than the counterpart on the official client.
Using the findify library, attempting to delete an object that does not exist will result in a 404 object not found AmazonS3Exception.
Whereas the official client in the same exact situation would return a success response.
in the mentioned issue i saw a pull request that addresses the described problem, would it be possible to merge it? Or would it be possible for you to allign the behaviour of this specific case to the behaviour that the official client would have in the same situation?
Hoping for a reply,
Thank you in advance.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: