-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Export idealized geometry to meshlab #65
Comments
If you point me in the right direction for exporting to a particular format, I can write the code. |
I am not familiar with meshlab, but the mesh is generated with gmsh, see https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/cardiac_geometries/tree/main/src/cardiac_geometries/_gmsh When you create a mesh with Not sure if I completely understand the question, but maybe this demo will clarify: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/cbcbeat/tree/master/demo/bidomain-biventricular ? |
"""Not sure if I completely understand the question, but maybe this demo will clarify: https://github.com/ComputationalPhysiology/cbcbeat/tree/master/demo/bidomain-biventricular ?""" This is helpful. So a purkinje system would simply be a separate mesh that has nodes that activate the fiber cells? I'd like to see an example at the cbcbeat page that runs the EP simulations with a purkinje system. If I fork and work on modifying https://github.com/fsahli/fractal-tree to work with your idealized BiV mesh example, would it be difficult for you all to make one of your demos work with a purkinje system? |
I'm not very familiar with dolfin, is there a way to export the fiber mesh to a file format that is readable by meshlab? Ideally I'd like to export it as an obj file, as I'd like to couple it with: https://github.com/fsahli/fractal-tree
Probably a silly question, and probably unrelated, but I'm new to this kind of modeling: the fiber output is what you would superimpose a purkinje network on for running cardiac EP, correct? E.g., once you've created the mesh of fibers, this is what one would use to then calculate a tissue simulation, or am I missing something? That is, the fibers, their angles, and type of tissue (endo, mid, epi), encode much of the anisotropy in the tissue; the base mesh, from which the fibers are made, is then discarded?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: